[chuckusaret]

Here is a "what if" amendment that I would agree to from 2002;

Dave Kopel & Robert Racansky on Guns on National Review Online

 

[threetango]

The last sentence makes the most sense.

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]That antigun politicians and the lobbyists who support them are so willing to exempt the government from the gun laws suggests that many gun-control laws have less to do with protecting public safety than with disarming the citizenry and exalting the government. The policy reflects a philosophy that sovereignty belongs to the government rather than to the people — which is just the opposite of what the Constitution says.[/FONT]

 

[artbrownsr]

Broken link try it again

 

[chuckusaret]

It appears the article was removed.

 

[threetango]

I can still see the article ?

 

[artbrownsr]

Yay! it's back up Thanks 3T, and Chuck!