Here is a "what if" amendment that I would agree to from 2002; Dave Kopel & Robert Racansky on Guns on National Review Online
The last sentence makes the most sense. [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]That antigun politicians and the lobbyists who support them are so willing to exempt the government from the gun laws suggests that many gun-control laws have less to do with protecting public safety than with disarming the citizenry and exalting the government. The policy reflects a philosophy that sovereignty belongs to the government rather than to the people — which is just the opposite of what the Constitution says.[/FONT]
