XD Forums banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,352 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Best article I've seen on Ferguson Mo.

What Ferguson means for police
Every police officer in America knows one thing – it could have been him ... or her. It could have been him or her, instead of Darren Wilson, who pulled that trigger on Michael Brown. Or some such similar young man.

Every cop in America knows that, in return for choosing a career in law enforcement, the rules of the road are now that, at any minute, it all could be over and you could become hated and condemned all across the country. No one would have your back, even our current president would denounce you. Because you defended yourself.

In a twist on biting the hand that feeds you, we are instead tying the hand that defends us. We are sending them out, and waiting for the first chance to gut them. It is an incomprehensible act of ingratitude.

All across American law enforcement, officers know that the new reality facing them when they pull their gun is: By defending myself, I could be condemning myself.

Take Darren Wilson. A good cop on routine patrol. He’s coming back from a call and has brief contact with two individuals. Nothing comes of it until he moves a ways down the block and gets a radio description of a wanted individual matching one of the young men he’s just seen.

Rolling back up on the two individuals, the larger of them – Michael Brown – lunges into the driver’s window of the squad car and begins assaulting Darren Wilson. Michael Brown then tries to take away the officer’s gun. The officer gets off a round, Michael Brown attempts to flee, and then charges at the officer, twice, before being shot to death. In the mind of witnesses and Darren Wilson, Michael Brown was set to attack and was an immediate threat to the life of Officer Wilson. So Officer Wilson did what his training taught him to do. He did what instinct, morality and the laws of men command him to do – he defended himself.

And his life is ruined. His career is over, his family is threatened, his name is destroyed, he has been vilified across the country and by the nation’s most prominent (?) voices. (I don’t class Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson as prominent.) People have rioted demanding imprisonment for him, and there have been countless threats on his life. His life, as he knew it, is over. Because he was a cop and he defended himself.

An entire society has forgotten that Darren Wilson is not the perpetrator of a crime, he is the victim of a crime. Likewise, it has been forgotten that Darren Wilson was an officer of the law with a duty to act, and that he was on patrol that day in the name and service of the people. And it is dispiriting to see how instantly the people have turned on him and his profession.

You get up in the morning and put on a uniform that carries with it the obligation to potentially die in the service of your community, to put yourself between the good people and whatever species of hell pops up, and then, when you are literally fighting for your life and the community’s protection, nobody has your back. Most everybody curses your name. Millions hate you. Much of the nation turns against you.

In the matter of some 20 seconds. Damned if you do… Dead if you don’t…

Every cop in America wakes up every day knowing that that could be his fate. By the happenstance of random probability, the unpredictability of criminality, some wild hare seizing upon who knows what thug, and that could be you. And it wouldn’t matter who you were, or what good you had done, or how many years you had served, or what you had made of your life and to what good cause you had dedicated it. Al Sharpton would be yelling your name, mobs would be burning your effigy, and President Barack Hussein Obama would be undercutting your profession. And who wants that?

What kind of person, having seen on the nation’s newscasts the destruction of Darren Wilson, wants to risk that? How many law enforcement officers will think of the danger associated with their thankless job, see the risk facing themselves and their family, recognize that it is completely unfair and wrong, and quit? How many will lay down their badge and their career and walk away? Probably none. Because that’s the kind of people most of them are. They press on. They do their duty. They don’t quit. That’s who they are.

More at issue is: Who are we? Are we the kind of society that looks on and does nothing, or are we the kind of society that values law enforcement and what it does, and has its back? Are we the kind of society that can look at the matter in Ferguson and push back the anti-cop prejudices and honestly consider the situation of Darren Wilson? Can we recognize the injustice of his situation?

Not that he wasn’t prosecuted, but that he was ever suspected. That an officer of the law, the victim of a violent and felonious attack, can be forced into a fight for his life, and then be condemned for winning. Would society have preferred he die? We all know that if the cop had died, instead of the guy who attacked him, that none of us would have ever heard of this. The president wouldn’t have commented, the nation wouldn't have noticed, nobody would have given a damn. Dead cop, no problem. Dead thug, raise holy hell.

And every cop knows that. And carries that sad realization 24 hours a day. President Barack Hussein Obama said we need to train our police better. Maybe we need to train our society better. Maybe we should train the Michael Browns of the world to respect the law, and maybe we should train the rest of us to respect the law enforcers. And have their backs. Or at least understand the horrible risk and reality Ferguson creates for them. Because every cop knows today could be his day.

- by Bob Lonsberry © 2014
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,761 Posts
Excellent article. Very well said! Thanks for posting 3T...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
48 Posts
Lonsberry is a conservative blogger. A list with links of his most recent columns can be found at: http://lonsberry.com/previous.cfm

Note that there is a button on the page to read "Today's Column" at the top left.

It appears that the column posted here might be older because it only indicates that one shot was fired inside the officer's car when forensic evidence shows that two shots were fired inside the car.

Comparing the grand jury transcript and the blogosphere with the reportage of the national news media, one reaches the inescapable conclusion that the news media is deliberately "managing" the news that is reported so as to incite the violence that has erupted. CNN and MSNBC cannot escape blame for much of the violence, looting and burning that has been taking place in past days. It is what happens when a "news" network's priorities shift from one of informing the public, to one of entertaining the public.

Disgusting! :mad:
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
"to one of entertaining the public. "

Make that "manipulating" the public to increase market share.....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
48 Posts
"to one of entertaining the public. "

Make that "manipulating" the public to increase market share.....
I don't disagree that they are manipulating, but with the attention span of Americans today, they need to keep us entertained in order to manipulate us, don't they? I mean, if we don't find the programs entertaining, we won't watch them. If we don't watch them, we cannot be manipulated by them.

Television is an entertainment industry. It always has been. Ratings are dependent on the entertainment value of TV productions, and TV news is no exception, IMO.
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
I don't disagree that they are manipulating, but with the attention span of Americans today, they need to keep us entertained in order to manipulate us, don't they? I mean, if we don't find the programs entertaining, we won't watch them. If we don't watch them, we cannot be manipulated by them.

Television is an entertainment industry. It always has been. Ratings are dependent on the entertainment value of TV productions, and TV news is no exception, IMO.
I'll have to take your word about TV programing being "interesting". I have no TV nor have had for more that 40 years. I am unable to understand not being able to find something more interesting to do than watch television. My only experience is having people tell me about watching television. The vast majority of what they tell me about sounds like nonsense. But then, each to his own.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
48 Posts
I'll have to take your word about TV programing being "interesting". I have no TV nor have had for more that 40 years. I am unable to understand not being able to find something more interesting to do than watch television. My only experience is having people tell me about watching television. The vast majority of what they tell me about sounds like nonsense. But then, each to his own.
I didn't say that television was "interesting." I said it was entertaining. I have never watched "American Idol," or "America's Got Talent," but millions of people do. There are so many Americans who are addicted to TV entertainment shows that we should not be surprised that they can be easily manipulated. :(

Most Americans do not realize that the TV shows that they have, in the past, been watching in order to gain information now only provide entertainment, with virtually no information at all. In particular, I am referring to the so-called TV news networks. If you want to see a prime example, clench your teeth and watch a single day of the programs on the "HLN" channel. It is difficult to imagine that "HLN" once stood for "Headline News." The news is long gone, and Nancy Grace remains. :dizzy:
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top